Built by the friends of Donald Tenn
  • Home
  • Abduction of Madison Nicole Tenn
  • About Donald Tenn
  • Activism Pictures
  • Contact
  • Donald Tenn letters of reference
  • Fathers 4 Justice (F4J)
  • In the news!
  • Madison’s Christmas Gifts
  • Pictures of Madison and her daddy
  • The "EX" files
  • Video’s of Donald Tenn in “ACTION”
KEEP IN TOUCH

Response Letter from US Senator Dianne Feinstein

Mar20
2012
Leave a Comment Written by admin

US Senator Dianne Feinstein responds to my recent letter, my thoughts, “Blah Blah, Blah… I have written you a hundred letters about children’s rights, all of which you have ignored, you need to get your priorities straight Senator Feinstein, our children’s rights should always be paramount on everyone’s mind!”

Dear Mr. Tenn :

Thank you for your letter opposing the ” Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2012″ (S. 2102). I appreciate knowing your views and welcome the opportunity to share my perspective on the matter.

As you may know, the threat of cybersecurity attacks is one of the greatest threats our nation faces. American financial institutions have incurred multi-million dollar losses due to cyber thefts. Even computer security companies and national security agencies like the FBI and Department of Defense have fallen victim to cyber attacks . Finally, cyber attackers hack into our personal computers, accessing our private information, and using our computers to launch other attacks. These cyber intrusions affect the United States in substantial and real ways, and the threat is only growing.

In fact, during a recent Senate Intelligence Committee hearing about current and projected national security threats to the United States, the U.S. Intelligence Community’s official testimony said that cyber threats, alongside terrorism and proliferation, are the highest priority threats to our national security. An unclassified report by the Intelligence Community made public in November 2011 said cyber intrusions against U.S. companies cost billions of dollars annually. Unfortunately, better cybersecurity is prevented by current laws and business practices which prevent or deter the private sector from sharing information about cyber threats they face and losses of information and money they suffer.

To improve the sharing of cybersecurity information, I introduced the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2012. This bill would authorize companies to monitor and defend their own networks. It would establish procedures for private sector companies to share cyber information with each other and with the federal government, and establish procedures for the government to share classified cybersecurity threat information with certified private sector entities. This legislation is incorporated into the ” Cybersecurity Act of 2012″ (S. 2105), which is cosponsored by Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), and Senator John Rockefeller (D-WV).

It is important to note that the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2012 protects privacy and civil liberties. It does not provide any new authorities for conducting surveillance, and it has robust measures to ensure that information shared with the federal government is protected. Furthermore, participation in information sharing under this bill would be voluntary for companies, and the bill would limit the government’s ability to use private sector cyber information for approved cybersecurity purposes only. Other sections of the bill provide for very limited regulation of critical infrastructure systems that, if disrupted through cyber means, could lead to the deaths of thousands of people or the loss of billions of dollars.

After reviewing intelligence on cyber threats for many years, it is clear to me that cyber attackers are causing major damage to Americans, our national security, and our economy. Please know that as Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I am dedicated to fighting the threats we face and I believe this bill will help us in our fight against cyber attacks .

Again, thank you for your letter. I appreciate knowing your views and hope you continue to inform me of issues that matter to you. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact my office in Washington D.C. at (202) 224-3841.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged Cyber Information Sharing Act, DC, US Senator Dianne Feinstein, Washington

REWARD FOR ARREST Christina Anderson / Sacramento, California

Mar05
2012
1 Comment Written by admin

On february 22, 2012 the Fathers4Justice office was burglarized of tens of thousands of dollars in office equipment. Said office equipment also consisted of very sensitive, legal and emotional data.

I am very disgruntled with regard to the lackadaisical attitude being taken by the authorities with regard to the burglary of said office equipment.

I further believe and statistics prove that because this crime was committed by a white female named Christina Anderson from Sacramento, California(Florin Area) it is not being given the serious consideration it would be given if the crime were committed by a male. AND what will happen to Christina Anderson when she is arrested?

The California State law as described in Penal Code 459 PC is not by any means vague, nor is the crime considered lightly, If you are entering a structure with the intent to commit a felony, or any theft once inside, this is considered to be 1st degree burglary with a penalty of up to 6 years in prison. In California you do not even have to “break and enter” in order to be recognized as a burglar. If any part of your body crosses the threshold of any building, including a flashlight in your control, you have illegally entered that building.

Will the prosecuting attorney of Sacramento, Jan Scully prosecute Christina Anderson of Sacramento, California for 1st degree burglary? Well, every law abiding citizen would certainly hope so, wouldn’t they. Attorney’s, if of course being compensated to do so will argue anything. The prosecuting attorney is however a salaried position, as a matter of record, Sacramento tax payers pay Jan Scully $236,870 a year, no more or less, win or lose. What then is the prosecuting attorney’s incentive? Percentages, how many convictions do they have? That is what it’s all about, whether or not one is convicted of 1st degree burglary or jaywalking. If one pleads guilty to jaywalking, Jan keeps her percentages up and keeps her job.

Sacramento prosecuting attorney Jan Scully and I have crossed paths before. Almost a full 6 years ago I asked her office to prosecute my then wife Shannon Phillips for abducting our daughter Madison. We all know how that turned out, here I am a full 6 years later, once a primary care giving stay at home daddy, now an alienated stranger. Why didn’t Jan prosecute Shannon? was it a gender issue? Of course it was, if i would have taken our daughter Madison across 6 state lines, I would literally still be in jail.

As futile as my attempts may seem, I am very adamant when it comes to matters regarding the law. For the most part, these laws were suggested by us the citizenry and then written by our elected officials on our behalf. Why then must we always fight to have these laws enforced? I will however again go and sit and wait in Jan Scully’s office and again ask that she do the right thing, prosecute this criminal to the full extent of the law regardless of their gender. Obviously if Jan would have prosecuted Shannon Phillips for abducting my daughter Madison 6 years ago, I would not be here now…

In the mean while, I have been taking every measure possible to garner the return of our equipment. I was told day one by the police, “Forget about it Mr. Tenn, everything is long gone”. “What? you are giving up already? we haven’t even gotten started investigating and we are giving up? Not I.” We have in fact received part of our equipment back, it was not of course as a direct result of fine police work. It was because I would not give up and Christina Anderson of Sacramento, California I know you are reading this. You stole over 8,000 pictures and gigabytes of video of my daughter, my children, my family and my friends, rest assured, I will never stop until I have every item returned and you are incarcerated for a full 6 years in prison.

With all of this stated, the fact remains that SOME members of the Sacramento Police Department and now the Detective are just sitting on this case. We have eye witnesses, sworn statements, video, finger prints and more yet the detective is too busy to go and pick Christina Anderson up. Hell, I have even been told where Christina is and how to get ahold of her!!! How do we resolve this issue? Well, we are going to need to garner some media attention. SpiderMan is old and tired, his costume doesn’t fit too well anymore but obviously we are going to need him to step up once again and fight crime.

Peter Parker

Posted in "In The News", Upcoming Actions - Tagged burglary, California(Florin Area), Christina Anderson of Sacramento, Detective, jan scully, Police, REWARD FOR ARREST, Sacramento Prosecuting attorney, Sheriff, spiderman

livestream video via phone

Feb10
2012
Leave a Comment Written by admin

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged bambuser, donaldtenn, F4J, fathers-4-justice, Fathers4Justice, livestream, ustream

Congresswoman Doris Matsui / SOPA letter response

Jan23
2012
Leave a Comment Written by admin

January 23, 2012

Mr. Donald Tenn

Dear Donald:

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about H.R. 3261, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue.

As Co-Chair of the Congressional High Tech Caucus and member of the House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology, I have been following this issue closely. While I believe that we should work to combat online copyright infringement, I share your concern that if SOPA is enacted as currently written, it will cause substantial harm to the innovation and economic opportunities created by the Internet. Because of this, I recently joined several of my colleagues in writing a letter to the House Judiciary Committee voicing our concerns over the bill and its potentially negative consequences on consumers and small businesses. I am also an original co-sponsor of the OPEN Act, which will ensure that the internet continues to remain open and is accessible for consumers and entrepreneurs.

During this time of continued economic uncertainty, we should be helping our businesses grow and our innovators develop. Unfortunately, I believe that the SOPA legislation will do the opposite. Please know that I will continue to monitor this important issue, and that I will keep your thoughts in mind should SOPA pass out of the Judiciary Committee and reach the floor of the House for a vote.

Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding this issue. To learn more about my work in Congress, or to sign up for periodic e-mail updates, please visit my website at www.house.gov/matsui .

Sincerely,

DORIS O. MATSUI
Member of Congress

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged Congresswoman, Donald Tenn, Doris Matsui, SOPA

Merry Christmas?

Dec19
2011
Leave a Comment Written by admin

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged Child Abuse, Divorce, Donald Tenn, F4J, fathers for justice, fathers-4-justice, Madison Nicole Tenn, Parental Alienation

Divorced fathers will not get legal right to access their children

Nov03
2011
Leave a Comment Written by admin

Divorced fathers will not get legal right to access
The Family Justice Review dashes hopes of groups such as Fathers 4 Justice

Owen Bowcott, legal affairs correspondent
The Guardian, Wednesday 2 November 2011
Article history

Fathers 4 Justice have staged high-profile protests demanding paternal rights after divorce or separation. Photograph: Michael Stephens/Empics
Fathers who have gone through divorce or separation will not be granted a legal right to guarantee that their child has “a meaningful relationship with both parents”, according to a long-awaited report on family law.

The Family Justice Review draws back from one of its key interim recommendations that had raised the hopes of groups such as Fathers 4 Justice, which campaigns for improved paternal access rights.

The review also condemns the lengthy court delays involved in care cases and calls for a statutory, six-month limit to be imposed on reaching decisions in child protection cases “save in exceptional circumstances”.

“The average care case in county courts now takes over 60 weeks and many take much longer – an age in the life of a child,” the report states. “These delays contribute to the two years seven months it takes on average for a child to be adopted. With 20,000 children now waiting for a decision, delay is likely to rise further.”

David Norgrove, the civil servant and businessman who chaired the review, said: “We need to eliminate the shocking delays in the system. Every year 500,000 children and adults are involved in the family justice system. They turn to it at times of great stress and conflict.

“It must deliver the best possible outcome for all the children and families who use it, because its decisions directly affect the lives and futures of all those involved, and have repercussions for society as a whole.”

Other recommendations in the 228-page report include:

• The creation of a family justice service to make sure agencies and professionals work together.

• More specialist judges to hear cases from start to finish to ensure consistency in the system.

• Less reliance on unnecessary expert witnesses and reports.

• Increased mediation to prevent cases going to court unnecessarily.

But it is the review’s decision on whether there should be a legal right for the child to continue having a “meaningful relationship with both parents” that appears to have been most problematic.

In its introduction, it states: “We are aware that some will be disappointed by our decision to recommend against a legal presumption around shared parenting and to step back even from the recommendations we made in this respect in our interim report.

“The evidence we received showed the acute distress experienced by parents who are unable to see their children after separation. This is an issue we know countries around the world try to tackle, and fail.

“Our conclusion was reached reluctantly but clearly. The law cannot state a presumption of any kind without incurring unacceptable risk of damage to children.”

Many fathers and grandfathers who had submitted evidence to review had supported it as an “important step”, the report notes, “reflecting how society has changed and give hope to the thousands of fathers who wish to have an active and appropriate engagement in their child’s upbringing”.

But countries such as Australia, where a similar right was established in 2006, the report explained, had seen an increase in litigation, creating even more legal confrontations. “As a result we withdraw the recommendation that a statement of ‘meaningful relationship’ be inserted in the legislation.”

Jane Robey of National Family Mediation said: “We welcome the enhanced role for mediators. Our mediators receive the best training in the country and are experts in their field. We believe mediation provides the best outcomes for families and children and gives people the chance to make their own decisions about their future if they choose to mediate. ”

Lottie Tyler, a family law specialist with the solicitors Weightmans, said: “It comes back to the overriding principle that children’s welfare has to be put first.”

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged Children's rights, Custody, Divorce, donald Tenn Fathers4Justice F4J Fathers for justice Fathers Day Nationwide Fatherless Day Rallies, F4J, Fathers4Justice

Ustream from Fathers4Justice Rally

Oct10
2011
Leave a Comment Written by admin

Posted in "In The News" - Tagged Canada fathers4justice f4j, Donald Tenn, donald Tenn Fathers4Justice F4J Fathers for justice Fathers Day Nationwide Fatherless Day Rallies, F4J, Fathers4Justice, PAA, PAAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Awareness, Parental Alienation is child abuse

Fathers 4 Justice website shut down!

Sep07
2011
1 Comment Written by admin
As copied from my Facebook page:
Donald Tenn
What a coincidence? We name judge Peter DiGiangi as the Fathers4justice “Asshole of the Month” and then our website is shut down… “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. – Mahatma Gandhi
 ·  · 22 hours ago

  • Steve Brown, Jeremy Tarrant, Cheryl Tompot and 12 others like this.
    • Jocelyn Ouellet Well…. it means it all !

      21 hours ago ·  ·  2 people
    • Meghan Seiter Wow.

      16 hours ago · 
    • Mary Prayne Well, you certainly got someone’s attention. good Job

      15 hours ago · 
    • Ulysses Adam Herrera They are violating freedom of speech!

      13 hours ago · 
    • Karen Floyd It all comes down to bullsh@#$%^&*!!! How’s things going?

      12 hours ago · 
    • Les Jobst A quick Google search show the guy has a very jaded past. Imagine that, he is a divorce attorney! He must be friends with the Union Boss Jimmy Hoffa with his “take the SOB’s out” style of dealing with a debate because he knows he can’t win with the Truth & actual facts. So what’s the plan to get thing back & running?

      6 hours ago · 
    • Donald Tenn I will not say in this forum what our plans are, I can however GUARANTEE everyone that the Fathers4Justice website will be back up, Peter DiGiangi will still be the “Asshole of the Month” and we have decided to throw another judge’s name up for good measure ;-) The site will be better than before and we will continue to expose the corruption in America’s family and juvenile courts, that is after all our job, we will not be silenced.THANK YOU to everyone who has called and written, we are not ignoring you, just busy. All other F4J social media are still operational. The new Discussion forum is up, our LinkedIn account is busy and growing, our “Causes” page is up, our new FB page is fine and at last count we had 20 new followers on our Twitter account just today!THANK YOU for your understanding and continued support for the true best interest of our children, BOTH, fit and willing parents playing an equally active role in their children’s lives.

      Thanks and Peace

      2 hours ago ·  ·  2 people
Posted in "In The News" - Tagged F4J, fathers for justice, fathers-4-justice, Fathers4Justice, fathersforjustice, web site, website

Parental Alienation by Dr. Nicholas Browning

Aug06
2011
Leave a Comment Written by admin
Other Voices: The damage of parental alienation not always obvious
By Nicholas Browning, MD
Over the past year, I have witnessed a process where a child’s previously loving relationship with a parent is irrevocably damaged by parental alienation. Parental alienation usually occurs in the setting of a divorce or separation, where children unjustifiably reject a parent.
The process is complex, and there is often a dynamic where one parent encourages the children to take sides against the other parent.
The message given is “it is no longer safe to love the other parent, and you must choose sides.” It is emotional abuse, and should be regarded as child abuse by society and the court.
There is a lot of unnecessary debate in the medical and legal fields about the terminology.
The real issues are the conduct of parents and the response from the child. Whether it is called estrangement, alignment, or alienation does not matter — the focus should properly be placed on the behavior. The degree of official response should be tailored to the degree of behavior.
Badmouthing that does not result in estrangement requires less official response than cases where children do start to reject a parent.
A terrible tragedy occurs when parents tell children that the other parent is bad, untrustworthy, or evil. These messages go directly to the child’s sense of self, as they are half of their mother and father.
Depriving a child of a previously loving relationship with a parent profoundly affects their sense of security. The alienating parent may “win” by getting the child to side with them, but the child loses one of the pillars of self-esteem.
In the adversarial court system, some parents lose focus on the welfare of their children in favor of “winning.”
Unfortunately, Family Court is ill-equipped to deal with such cases. Often, the official response is to allow the child to stay with the alienating parent with the hope that time will heal the relationship with the estranged parent.
Meaningful consequences are rarely applied.
Addressing this process requires urgency, as the longer it goes on, the more difficult it is to treat and the more the child is hurt. Left unchecked, some parents eventually have no option other than to disengage from their child to reduce the conflict.
The standard orders in court include language instructing parents not to denigrate the other parent, but enforcement is difficult and many parents realize the court will rarely do anything substantive about it.
There appears to be a tacit acceptance that parents will badmouth each other, although it is clearly child abuse. Physical abuse is addressed quickly, but emotional abuse goes unchecked until the situation becomes egregious.
Judges and other law professionals require more training and societal support to deal with this issue. The essential question to ask is “has the relationship changed between the parent and child?”
A previously loving relationship that turns into rejection from the child should be quickly investigated to determine the reason.
If alienation is determined to be taking place, swift action such as fines, jail time, or drastic alterations in visitation should be utilized. Simply telling parents to “not do that again” has little effect in the emotional time of a divorce where clear thinking is difficult for anyone.
Behavior is altered best with consequences, not lectures. Society should support courts when action is taken.
Family Court is reluctant to quickly address these complex cases, but it is necessary. The primary duty of Family Court should be to keep children safe. Emotional abuse is far more difficult to see than physical abuse, but the effects are long-lasting, just as real and the wounds may never heal.
Encouraging a child to think badly or reject either parent is child abuse — period. It destroys security and self-esteem. Healthy development can become impossible. Allowing it to take place in Family Court, results in a failure of that primary duty.
If you are a parent in a divorce, don’t say bad things about the other parent – it will hurt your child more than the other parent.
If you are grandparents in a divorce, be a positive influence on your children and help them to realize that taking sides with grandchildren damages them.
If you are a judge or other law professional, pay the same attention to parental alienation as you would physical abuse — and have the courage to take action when needed.
Please do not tolerate such behavior. Children need to feel safe loving both parents.
Nicholas Browning, MD, lives in Grass Valley.
Posted in Parental Alienation - Tagged Accountability, Canada fathers4justice f4j, Donald Tenn, donald Tenn Fathers4Justice F4J Fathers for justice Fathers Day Nationwide Fatherless Day Rallies, F4J, Fathers4Justice, Judge Thomas Cecil, Kathy Waseen, Madison Nicole Tenn abduction and abuse, PAA, PAAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Awareness, Parental Alienation is child abuse, Psychological Abuse, Shannon Dawn Phillips

“YOU” can make the world a better place

Jun25
2011
Leave a Comment Written by admin
I am a volunteer, I donate my time to help others, primarily children. How did I come to a point in time where I deemed it what I wanted to do? My father instilled these values in me, if you are a volunteer, you know how you feel when you help others who are less fortunate or who may be down on their luck. Whatever the situation may be, It definitely feels better to give than to receive…
10 Quotes to Inspire You to Do More Good


You work hard to support the causes that are important to you, and you’re not alone. Just listen to what some of the great authors, politicians, and activists of the world have to say about making a difference. Their words speak to the impact you — or any single — person can have on the world.

10. “If you can’t feed a hundred people, then feed just one.”  - Mother Teresa

9. “Volunteers do not necessarily have the time; they just have the heart.” - Elizabeth Andrew

8. “A bone to the dog is not charity.  Charity is the bone shared with the dog, when you are just as hungry as the dog.”  - Jack London

7. “The smallest act of kindness is worth more than the grandest intention.” - Oscar Wilde

6. “Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see.” - Mark Twain

5. “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better.  It’s not.”  - Dr. Seuss

4. “Everybody can be great. Because anybody can serve. You don’t have to have a college degree to serve.  You don’t have to make your subject and your verb agree to serve… You don’t have to know the second theory of thermodynamics in physics to serve.  You only need a heart full of grace.  A soul generated by love.”  - Martin Luther King, Jr.

3. “I’ve learned that you shouldn’t go through life with a catchers mitt on both hands.  You need to be able to throw something back.”  – Maya Angelou

2. “We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.”   - Winston Churchill

1. “How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.”  - Anne Frank

 

Posted in Just my thoughts... - Tagged care for others, charity, children. life, Donald Tenn, donate, help others, Kindness, love, Pay it forward, spiderman, Volunteer
« Older Entries

Recent Posts

  • Response Letter from US Senator Dianne Feinstein
  • REWARD FOR ARREST Christina Anderson / Sacramento, California
  • livestream video via phone
  • Congresswoman Doris Matsui / SOPA letter response
  • Merry Christmas?

Recent Comments

  • Casey Anthony on REWARD FOR ARREST Christina Anderson / Sacramento, California
  • jim on Activism Pictures
  • Robbie on Does your Wife or Ex-Wife Have a Golden Uterus Complex?
  • My Homepage on Abduction of Madison Nicole Tenn
  • Marlyn Stallsmith on Abduction of Madison Nicole Tenn

Pages

  • Abduction of Madison Nicole Tenn
  • About Donald Tenn
  • Activism Pictures
  • Contact
  • Donald Tenn letters of reference
  • Fathers 4 Justice (F4J)
  • In the news!
  • Madison’s Christmas Gifts
  • Pictures of Madison and her daddy
  • The "EX" files
  • Video’s of Donald Tenn in “ACTION”

Blogroll

  • 30 Day Protest for our Children's Rights
  • Dedicated to Madison
  • Family Preservation Festival
  • Fathers 4 Justice
  • Live Stream Video 24/7 of 30 Day Protest
  • Spiderman Daddy
  • Super Hero Dads!

 

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories

  • "In The News"
  • Just my thoughts…
  • Parental Alienation
  • Upcoming Actions

Archives

  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011

Tags

30 day protest 2011 - 45 CoDr. Tara J. Pamatier Abuse Accountability Blame Canada fathers4justice f4j care for others charity Children's rights children. life Custody Divorce Donald Tenn donald Tenn Fathers4Justice F4J Fathers for justice Fathers Day Nationwide Fatherless Day Rallies donate Dr Tara J. Palmatier on May 17 F4J fathers-4-justice Fathers4Justice Fathers4Justice F4J Spiderman 30dayprotest DonaldTenn children's rights divorce fathers for justice Fathers Rights Financial Abuse help others High-Conflict Kindness love Madison Nicole Tenn abduction and abuse Mayor Kevin "KJ" Jackson PAA PAAD Parental Alienation Parental Alienation Awareness Parental Alienation Awareness Day PAAD PAAO April 25th Proclamation Parental Alienation is child abuse Pay it forward Personality Disorders Professional Victims Psychological Abuse Relationship Advice Relationships Sacramento Kings spiderman Unhealthy Relationships Volunteer

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

EvoLve theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Built by the friends of Donald Tenn